Ga naar de inhoud

Arthur Guirdham - Nieuw project

Menu overslaan
CAMELOT MAGAZINE
Title
Menu overslaan
PARADISE FOUND
Reflections on Psychic Survival
A guide to making the most of life on earth – and beyond




INTRODUCTION

“The other day when  walking down a lane an iron cage tightened round my breastbone. The tide  of life went out. My psyche, pulsating in a thin wavelet on the shore,  resisted the suction of the ebb tide. I had another and sharper attack  of angina. I sat on a stone and let it pass. It was a still day with a  touch of autumn in the air. I wondered if in the seasons of my soul, it  was later than autumn. Because of this closer intimation of mortality it  seemed to me that the day has come when I should summarise what I have  learnt in my passage through this world. It seemed that by so doing I  might return, dressed in another garb, to my vocation as a doctor,  because what I have to say is both realistic and reassuring. Though it  starts off with the proposition that we endure the worst here in this  world, we end with the knowledge that we achieve a peace not of  annihilation and unending sleep, but something of which we are  conscious.
 
The  evening of my attack I insisted on going to a small dinner given by a  woman whom I had appointed to her first job forty-three years ago and  who wished for the presence of her first chief. I was very happy. It was  obvious that my hostess had given and received much affection from the  staff she had directed. There was such a harmony of love and gratitude  that I was loathe to leave the party early. Inside the well lit room  with its white walls my psyche was loosened from my personality. The  psyche is the immortal and mature element of our nature which enters us  at conception. The personality is what we fabricate slowly from the  conspiracy between our genes and our environment. My liberated psyche  relived those earlier days when the high trees deadened the traffic past  my house, when what is now a park was a field glistening with  buttercups and with the cuckoo calling from beyond the high elms on  mornings of May.
 
Because  of my soulʼs ephemeral freedom from the chains of personality I was  joined to the psyches of those around me. This is a deeper, rarer and  briefer experience of love than what we mean by the word which conveys  too often possession smeared with the anodyne of beautiful sensations.  Out in the dark streets it was different. I could, because I was still  living in my psyche, enjoy the iridescent green of the leaves near the  street lamps and the shape of the trees, their branches raised in  imploring arms to a starlit but inscrutable sky.
 
Then  the spell was broken. I wondered how it was with those with whom I had  dined, when they went home and whether, like me, they shunned the  hostile frontiers of night beyond the street lamps; whether, alone, at  home, they reverted to a sense of their own solitude, recollecting that  in the end, at death and often years before it we are so often alone as  far as contact with other personalities are concerned. Sometimes in  dying we are able to smile at arms raised to welcome us by psyches still  watching over us.
 
Nevertheless  it was a dark thought to think of the light room and the unity of love  within it, and to recall that, away from others, away from such rare  harmonies, away even from the coarser consolation of the tribal  instinct, so many of us are frightened and alone.
 
It  is for this reason that I begin to write this book which tries to  answer questions we all ask, of others if we are honest, of ourselves if  we bluff. Where do we come from and what are we here for? What happens  after death and what, if any, is the purpose of life? There will be  little theorising. I leave that to the theologians and scientists who  constitute the two sides, one dulled, the other unnaturally burnished,  of the same worn penny. What I write expresses not only my philosophical  attitude but is the story of my inner life. The two motives are  inseparable. All philosophy is the muted story of one man’s struggle  with the universe. In writing this record I will not discard the weapons  of intuition and logic which served me well enough in the practice of  medicine. The older I grew the more I relied on the former for diagnosis  and the latter for its justification. Nor will I reject those deep and  sudden convictions which pierced me like lightning when, as a boy in  Cumberland, on the road to Loweswater, walking between hedges frothing  with honeysuckle, its odour borne towards me by the soft sea wind, I was  stabbed to the heart by my sudden realisation of the changeless,  grocer’s shop prescriptions of Christianity, of the special allowance  which would be undoubtedly made (provided the representations to God  were suitably phrased) for blacks and other zoological embarrassments  who had never heard the Word. In these moments I was tiptoeing cunningly  past the elastic and rapidly expanding frontiers of hell; but the  seawind was blowing, the roses were blooming. By Loweswater it was all  heaven and no wind and the silence and beauty were unbroken by the  mutterings of hell expressed in the echoes of theological ideas. In this  hell I had walked in heaven. Such sudden convictions which fill the  gulf created by a missed heartbeat are of great importance. I will speak  also a little of the truth implicit in beauty, and which I felt in my  childhood and boyhood as a total experience to be lost with age. In  adult life I was still transported by beauty, but its manifestations  were more external and I was not wholly engulfed by it. But what I am  most concerned with is revealed truth because, without pride or humility  and mostly with regret, I accept that I have been given the capacity to  hear those who speak truth from worlds where this life is seen, not in  its fullness, but in its very littleness as the ripple of a breath on  the waters of the Cosmos. I have also learnt truth directly from a  memory extending over millennia and which includes an immensity of pain.
 
For  those for whom to communicate with the ones we call dead spells  imbalance and hysterical suggestibility, it should be said that my  approach to revealed truth was logical and progressive. It began with  the intensive verification of minute historical data, and proceeded  onwards through psychic synchronisations to direct communications from  the dead who, in speaking of past lives, fulfilled the dictum of Plato  that truth and wisdom are merely memory, provided the latter extends  beyond the confines of a single life. I learnt what I know not in the  timeless half-dream, half-death of life as a lecturer in philosophy at  an Oxford College, but in psychic warfare extended over decades; when  people took their lives because they could not penetrate the mystery of  the hell about them, and in which, at peace for a moment watching the  tapers of the almond blossom hastening the dispersing mists of winter. I  was suddenly aware of someone in need and hastened to find them at the  point of suicide”.

 
CONCLUSION

“The  first chapters of this book have been in my mind for decades. They are  an expression of my basic  nature. In my attitude to organized religion I  could not have felt other than I did. It was all in the marrow of my  bones. In the first chapters I make my case for revealed truth.   Afterwards I divulge its contents. I learnt what I have divulged by a  process of initiation in which I learnt the symbols through which  psychic and spiritual men have communicated with each other through  centuries. When I achieved the capacity to talk to the discarnates at  different degrees I acquired an understanding of what would formerly  have been incomprehensible to me. Sometimes what they communicated was  so difficult that I only understood it while I was actually speaking  with them and had to write it down in order not to forget it. I have  excluded such matter from this book which contains nothing which is not  now clear to me at the conscious level.
 
It  may seem to some that I have stressed too much the virtues of  passivity, that I have spoken too much of knowing rather than being and  doing. When I speak of passivity I am describing an inner attitude and  not an outward demeanour. The last thing I wish  to convey is that the  truth is the prerogative of a self-elected immobile elite. I have met  these people who, sitting with folded arms, seek to impress by claiming  special insights and exuding a self-conscious serenity. It is not a  pleasant sight. All of us are born to occupy different action stations  in this life. We cannot escape our destiny. But let it be said with  resounding emphasis that our destiny is also our duty. We are here to  work, whatever the outcome, and to express those traits of personality  which we have developed in past lives and which must be evolved further.  They are the mechanisms by which we learn.
 
If  this world is a battleground between good and evil, it is not enough to  recognize this and remain neutral. Certainly benevolent neutrality  towards ourselves is better than a protracted puritanical brawl between  the spirit and the flesh. We must accept that we ourselves are an  expression in miniature of the battle in the macrocosm. If we hate and  castigate ourselves too much for our own failings we increase our  tension and with it our sense of apartness and this is a great evil. We  must recognize that we live in a world of emanation. Our own good acts  are not our own. We do not generate love but are possessed by it. The  evils which afflict us, the very diseases from which we suffer, are  rarely self-inflicted. In them we are overborn by the power of evil.  This is where an understanding of the nature of the Cosmos is so vital  to our well being. It helps us to accept that we are interconnected  molecules in nature and not lords of creation.
To  accept that we are enveloped in waves of good and evil enables us to  live naturally and to avoid being trapped in ethical systems. The  moralists are all too often the persecutors.
 
We  are here to accept ourselves as we are and other people as they are.  This is not fatalism but commonsense. Fatalism implies doom and is only  logical to those who think in terms of this world only. What we have to  accept is the certainty of defeat in this world, but this is no tragedy  if we are partakers in a continuing evolution in which we recognize the  world as the lowest rung of the ladder. But what happens even in this  world is that acceptance, in the deepest recesses of our hearts, of our  own limitations and of those of the world about us, enables us to  change. As soon as we recognize that we cannot change we are  changed, because to recognize that we cannot change is an abnegation of  the cult of personality and when this dies the wings of our psyche are  unfolded and we are reborn in this life. We pass from the world of  social and ethical standards to that of emanation. We emit light rather  than explanations.


PARADISE FOUND

PARADISE FOUND - The musings of a  distinguished psychiatrist and author that pull a lifetime’s experiences  together in an attempt to answer questions that concern us all, door  Arthur Guirdham. Uitgave van Turnstone Press Ltd, Wellingborough,  Northamptonshire, Engeland, 1980.


Arthur en zijn vrouw Mary in Bath,
Engeland, oktober 1979



Arthur Guirdham  (1905–1992) was psychiater, schrijver en dichter en jarenlang hoofd van  een psychiatrische kliniek voor kinderen in Engeland. Hij heeft een  indrukwekkende reeks boeken geschreven, een van zijn laatste heet Paradise found - A guide to making the  most of life on earth - and beyond (1980). Ik heb een aantal malen bij Arthur thuis gelogeerd in Bath,  Engeland. In de jaren zeventig stuurde hij me op een dag een artikel op  over de Catharen en reïncarnatie, een van de onderwerpen waarmee hij  zich bezighield.
 
Arthur  had onorthodoxe ideeën die in de jaren zestig en zeventig welkom waren.  Het was de tijd van bewustzijnsverruiming en spiritualiteit. Jongeren  trokken naar India, Nepal en Afghanistan voor spirituele verlichting,  die ze in hun eigen samenleving niet konden vinden. Men wilde een vrije  en vitale burgermaatschappij met open grenzen naar kennis. De  verbeelding moest aan de macht, de slogan van de jaren zestig: L'imagination au pouvoir! Arthurs ongebruikelijk ideeën betroffen psychosomatische geneeskunde, de oorsprong van ziekte, extra-sensory perception  - buitenzintuiglijke waarneming - in Nederland onderdeel van de  parapsychologie. Paraspychologie had veel belangstelling in die tijd,  ook in Nederland. Er was hier zelfs een faculteit Parapsychologie aan de  Universiteit van Utrecht. Het ziet ernaar uit dat dat anno 2021 niet  meer zou kunnen.
Een van Arthurs baanbrekende boeken was A Theory of Disease  (1957), een alternatief perspectief op ziekten. Het gaat bijvoorbeeld  in op de ontwikkeling van macht in de persoonlijkheid. In competitie met  de kuddemens raakt de ambitieuze mens verslaafd aan macht: "Beter  worden dan je medemens wil zeggen dat je, in termen van psychologie en  ook spiritualiteit, je je onderwerpt aan hun dictaat. Men wordt gedreven  tot steeds hoger klimmen omdat men geen vergelijking accepteert".  Arthur was ervan overtuigd dat suggestie een grote rol speelt en zowel  fysieke als licht psychiatrische ziekten veroorzaakt. Vooral het  zenuwstelsel van de Westerse mens is kwetsbaar, bezien vanuit zowel  fysiek als psychiatrisch oogpunt. Hij voorzag een gestage groei in obsessionals - 'geobsedeerden' - en  psychosomatische en stressziekten. Dikwijls bracht hij de gregarious herd ter sprake, de kuddemensen die o zo vatbaar zijn voor  massahysterie of massapsychose. Tegenwoordig hebben we het wel over intensieve menshouderij, een term die geen nadere uitleg nodig heeft.

 Arthur beschouwde religiositeit als een wezenlijk onderdeel van het  mens-zijn. Maar tegelijkertijd stond hij argwanend tegenover de  georganiseerde godsdienst. In zijn boeken wees hij er telkens weer op dat georganiseerde godsdienst, waaronder het kerkelijk christendom,  altijd uit is geweest op macht en manipulatie.
Een van Arthurs boeken is getiteld The psyche in medicine (1978). Hij vertelde me eens dat de psychologie het begrip ziel had weggewerkt uit haar eigen academische discipline. Een kwalijke ontwikkeling volgens hem.

Arthurs beschrijving van het begrip - onsterfelijke - ziel:
1. No final and perfected aspect of being
2. Essentially a vibrating channel
De  ziel is de verbinding tussen de aardse, tijdgebonden persoonlijkheid en de geïndividualiseerde geest, die weer de verbinding vormt met het universele (ondeelbare) bewustzijn, de ultieme bron van het zijn.

Alexandra Gabrielli, november 2021

©  Alexandra Gabrielli
Terug naar de inhoud